Log in

No account? Create an account

Eugie · Foster's · Self-Indulgent · Musings

Laptop voyaging and The Town Drunk

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · Profile

* * *
According to the FedEx website, my laptop is on the delivery truck in CA, on its way to HP. Waiting waiting waiting. I don't like waiting.


Writing Stuff

With The Town Drunk opening to submissions yesterday, I got my first taste of slush reading. And y'know what? I liked it! How twisted is that? It might be the giddy flush of an exciting new project, but I'm finding it to be both an enlightening and enjoyable experience--no doubt due in great part to the awesome submission system britzkrieg set up. I can understand how slushing could be overwhelming, as I only went through around half a dozen manuscripts yesterday before deciding I wanted to switch gears, which is a pretty small number compared to what folks like JJA or Douglas Cohen doubtless wade through on a daily basis. But I'm all fresh-faced and eager now.

Reading slush is different from reading to critique or review, or reading for pleasure for that matter. With critiques, I'm trying to analyze what worked and what didn't, and suggest fixes, often reaching into the "what Eugie would do if she'd written this" bin. When reviewing, I'm again focusing on the what worked/didn't work aspect--without the fix suggestions obviously--and dissecting the story's component pieces in an effort to convey to an audience the rationale behind my impressions. When I'm reading for enjoyment, I try to distance myself from the mechanics and assorted elements of a story and strive to immerse myself into the tale. If I do pause to consider the technical aspects, it's usually to admire, appreciate, and catalog them for my future writing consideration. (If I'm picking out what's wrong with a story I'm reading for pleasure, it's usually a sign that it's stopped being pleasurable and I'm about to put it down.) But slushing sort of falls between pleasure reading and review reading. While it's either a "yes, I liked this" or "nope, pass," I'm also evaluating whether I think a story will be enjoyed by a larger audience and if it fits into a market's mission statement/goals. And I've begun to have "this writer shows promise even though this story didn't float my socks. I wonder what their next submission will be like?" thoughts flit through my head, which is pretty cool.

New Words: Did a pair of editing passes on "Beauty's Folly," culling about three-hundred words, and packaged it up. Decided not to send it through Critters because I'm feeling cocky--probably a decision I shall regret later. But for now, I'm winging it out to market.

Club 100 For Writers

I'm feeling:
dorky dorky
* * *
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 3rd, 2006 05:58 pm (UTC), keesa_renee commented:
I was wondering when you were going to mention your new editorial hat! Congratulations!

The thing I like best about editing is I finally understand what editors mean when they say something like 'we liked it, but it's not for us'. We've had a few of those at DKA. So, who writes the rejection letters at Town Drunk? ;-) (We get to foist that off on our Managing Editor. :-D )

[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:42 am (UTC), eugie replied:
"So, who writes the rejection letters at Town Drunk?"

With the submission process currently in place, all the slush editors can reject along with britzkrieg. I actually don't mind that part either. After receiving so many rejections myself, I sort of think I've got a pretty solid feel for what counts as industry standard in that area. 'Course I haven't received hate mail yet. It'd be nice to avoid that aspect of slushing . . .
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 3rd, 2006 06:53 pm (UTC), squirrel_monkey commented:
Hi Eugie. I like slush reading too -- especially since I gained enough confidence to trust myself (if the story is painful on page 1, it probably won't get better on page 2.) Town Drunk sounds like a very cool mag!
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:45 am (UTC), eugie replied:
Glad to know I'm not a total freak on the slush-reading-is-fun front! I'm quite optimistic about this new venture.
* * *
On January 3rd, 2006 07:18 pm (UTC), faerie_writer commented:
Interesting foray into the slush pile. I think I would have fun as an editor too. :)
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:49 am (UTC), eugie replied:
I've heard horror stories and moans and groans from editors, so I was a bit trepidatious--and I'm waiting to see if some funny/scary slush events will manifest in the future. But so far, it's been way cool.
* * *
On January 3rd, 2006 07:25 pm (UTC), elvesforeyes commented:
Congrats on the new editorial hat. Slush away!
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:50 am (UTC), eugie replied:
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 3rd, 2006 08:14 pm (UTC), reddherring1955 commented:
The latest editing foray is indeed interesting. I shall have to look at the link to town drunk just in case it's a venue for any of my babies. My only worry is that we so often disagree on what's worthwhile and I'm usually wrong. Oh dear! But since my batting average has recently improved somewhat, nothing ventured, nothing gained.
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:56 am (UTC), eugie replied:
Eugie's Fourth (or was that seventh?) Rule of Writing: You can't win if you don't play.

You should definitely submit something! I think you write funny extremely well, which is exactly what TTD is looking for. And I wouldn't be slushing your stories, regardless, due to conflict-of-interest issues. There's enough submissions editors that we don't have to deal with the potentially sticky situation of reading friends and/or writers group members submissions. Whew.

[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 02:09 am (UTC), reddherring1955 replied:
That no conflict thing sounds good. Don't forget I'm "Louise Herring-Jones" on stories, but I always use my real name for checks. :>) I'll have to look through the remaining items in the closet and see if I have something not out that's potentially humor. Thanks for the tip.
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 3rd, 2006 10:11 pm (UTC), neo_prodigy commented:
i have a dell laptop so suffice to say i've had to replace mine more than once.

i can relate to the agonizing wait to get your computer back.
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 01:57 am (UTC), eugie replied:
I adore my laptop, and it's essential for my productivity, but they are so much frailer than desktop machines! Sigh.
* * *
On January 4th, 2006 06:58 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented:
Um, Eek. That market sounded like something up my alley, although at this point, I don't think I have anything under 5K.

I am, however, used to the anonymous editor/slush reader on the other end. It would be rather...odd...knowing Ms. Eugie might read my story. Yowza!

Pat Kirby
[User Picture]
On January 4th, 2006 07:07 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
Heh. If it makes you feel any better, The Town Drunk has a conflict of interest policy in place so that that us slushers don't have to/get to read submissions written by friends and/or writers group colleagues. Therefore, if we buy something of yours, while I would love to wink and get your undying gratitude for my nepotism, it would be undeserved. Likewise, if you get rejected, I didn't do it!

Submiiiit! You know you want to!
* * *

Previous Entry · Write something · Share · Next Entry