?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Eugie · Foster's · Self-Indulgent · Musings


Happy New Year!

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · Profile

* * *
HAPPY 2005!!

Rang in the new year quietly. Matthew and I went out to pick up a bottle of champagne and then curled up with Hobkin to watch Spider-Man 2 and Resident Evil: Apocalypse a la Netflix. I discovered that I can watch zombie flicks if they're action instead of horror (I've got major squicks when it comes to shambling undead). And at 11:30 we turned on the Peach Drop coverage in Underground ATL, poured the bubbly, and clinked in the new year.

Spider-Man 2 was exceptionally uninspiring. The action bits were good, but anything involving character development got tedious fast. Resident Evil: Apocalypse was better, all shiny and shoot-em-up. Although it really felt like a video game. I drank far more champagne than I ought to--I'm a total lightweight; two glasses does me in. All in all, a good way to end 2004.


Writing Stuff:

Saw a review of The 3rd Alternative #40 at Emerald City which highlighted my story to praise. An auspicious beginning for 2005:

"My favorite story, however, was "Running on Two Legs" by Eugie Foster . . . it was interestingly cute, and it has a refreshingly sanguine view of serious illness."
--Cheryl Morgan
I'm feeling:
content content
* * *
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 02:09 pm (UTC), dave_whittier commented:
Try Shaun of the Dead. My favorite zombie movie.
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 02:12 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
That's definitely on my list of "I can watch zombie movies, woo!"
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 04:22 pm (UTC), britzkrieg commented:
Hey -- your "writerly" user icon got a perm or something. Wacky!
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 04:25 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
Mmmf! I think my "toon" hair is merging with the back of the chair. I never noticed that before!
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 04:49 pm (UTC), britzkrieg replied:
Ah, I see. Of course. Maybe I should put my glasses on before reading my Friends list!
* * *
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 06:29 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
That's okay, I still think you rawk.
* * *
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 05:44 pm (UTC), pagmatic commented:
Happy New Year. Eugie and Matt:)!! We watched the Peach Drop also.

Didn't they show Shaun of the Dead at D*C? There was some hoopla about it from what I rememeber.

BTW, I have the first Daily Dragon toon in the works. It's best to start early:) Are there going to be any DD meetings or something pre-con? If so, let me know.

-Mike
[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 06:33 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
Happy New Year!

"Didn't they show Shaun of the Dead at D*C?"

I think they did, although if so, I didn't go, still being Leery With Extreme Prejudice (TM) of all zombie flicks at the time.

"BTW, I have the first Daily Dragon toon in the works."

Zounds. You're going to strain something!

"Are there going to be any DD meetings or something pre-con?"

Yepper. Check out the Dragon*Con.org website. The first all staff meeting is March 5th. Hope to see you there!

[User Picture]
On January 1st, 2005 06:42 pm (UTC), pagmatic replied:
re: staff meeting: Yeah, I'll be there with Mrs Pag.
* * *
On January 2nd, 2005 04:15 am (UTC), mtfay commented:
Is there some place to buy TTA 40 on the web? I haven't found any place in LA that seems to carry it.
[User Picture]
On January 2nd, 2005 04:42 am (UTC), eugie replied:
Yeah, it's hard to find in the U.S. You can buy a copy of it online from the Andromeda Science Fiction, Fantasy, & Horror Bookshop (in the UK). Also, Project Pulp will carry it, but it hasn't posted the current issue on their website yet. They only have up to issue #39, but I suspect #40 will go up in the next few weeks.
[User Picture]
On January 2nd, 2005 02:27 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
Oh! I just saw that it's also available at Clarkesworld Books.
* * *
On January 2nd, 2005 05:55 am (UTC), ex_angeldove677 commented:
Hmm. I've seen Spiderman #1 movie and I like it. Guess on the 2nd one they have that octopus man, and it does look like an animated cartoon from that commercial. So you think #1 is better than #2?
[User Picture]
On January 2nd, 2005 02:23 pm (UTC), eugie replied:
I liked 1 better than 2, although I think the EFX in 2 were probably smoother than in 1. Actually I think the Doc Ock character was one of the strengths in the sequel.
On January 2nd, 2005 09:56 pm (UTC), ex_angeldove677 replied:
It could be they have two different directors? Just like in Charlie's Angels. No. 1 is better than #2. That's because they have different directors in the movie. I think the #1 movie is classy and the # 2 movie is trashy!
* * *

Previous Entry · Write something · Share · Next Entry